| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Burnie Port Authority v. General Jones Pty ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd
''Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd'' (1994) 179 CLR 520 is a tort law case from the High Court of Australia, which decided it would abolish the rule in ''Rylands v. Fletcher'', and the ''ignis suus'' principle, incorporating them generally into the tort of negligence.
==Facts==
A fire, caused by an independent contractor’s employee welding negligently, began on the defendant’s premises and spread to a nearby property. The property was burnt causing A$2.5M of damages. The plaintiff sued under ignis suus, nuisance, negligence and the rule in ''Rylands v. Fletcher'' (a rule of absolute liability), interpreted in part through the duty of occupier to invitee.
The defendant was Burnie Port Authority (Burnie), located in Burnie Tasmania, who provided storage facilities, and the plaintiff was General Jones who stored a large quantity of frozen vegetables. General suffered damage when the vegetables were ruined by fire which destroyed Burnie property.
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|